Sure, there are always outliers and you can correct me if I’m wrong, but that’s just the overall impression I have.

(I wasn’t sure if !asklemmy@lemmy.world or this community would fit better for this kind of question, but I assume it fits here.)

  • fxomt@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    There are many right wingers here, not conservatives. Liberals are right wing, and lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works are mainly liberal instances.

    What rimu was mainly talking about are conservatives, or even far right users. So he wasn’t criticizing the whole right wing, he just used the term right wing to refer to those.

    • TheFonz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I know it’s comfortable to sit and call anything slightly right of ultra socialism as ‘right wing’ but a spectrum exists.

      To conflate republican evangelical dominionist Christians with liberals is peak hubris.

      There is a saying: ‘when you’re a hammer, every problem is a nail’. When you reduce everything to class warfare you’re not engaging in an effective discourse to reduce harm in the world. You’re just pontificating on the merits of socialism, which yea, we all agree are neat. But so what? You think folding everyone else into a basket gives you credence or helps the discourse in any way?

      • fxomt@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I wasn’t conflating. Conservatives are not liberals. But they are both right wing. (at least, classical liberals are)

        And there is more than just class warfare, i agree.

        But so what? why does it matter that they are right wing? not everyone has to be a communist.

        The term left and right are very ambiguous to define in the first place. Some people argue that leftism is anti-capitalism. Some argue that leftism is just belief in equality. They are all right. Same thing with the right wing.

        • TheFonz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I think my issue is with the usage of the phrase “right wing” because we need something scathing to label liberals. It doesn’t really contribute anything to the discourse except create layers of exclusion.

          Liberalism, broadly, is not interested in supporting or enabling hierarchies. The only thing they share in common with right wing conservatism is the ownership of private property -but that’s it. So lumping them all in the same bucket isn’t doing much for anyone except creating more exclusion at the risk of pushing forward socialist policies. The reality is liberals are probably more likely to favor equality, even if it’s just ideological. Shouldn’t we strive to bring more people on board and build bridges rather than continue this bizarre war of artrition?

          Wikipedia: Right Wing Politics

          • fxomt@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            My intent was not to cause division, I originally meant to clear things up for the user I was originally replying to, but things quickly descended into arguing about semantics. I agree that we should all work together to eliminate the rising threat of far right, fascist parties worldwide. That is what we should be focusing on.

            I’m tired over me bikeshedding, So i’m just going to forfeit out of this argument.

            Have a great weekend

      • fxomt@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        They are? i’m not sure where you live, but most of the world considers them to be right wing.

        • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          No. Liberalism is against most things that the right wing of the political spectrum explicitly stands for. Liberalism exists as a counter argument to conservatism. As I mentioned earlier US political language has twisted and distorted what these words really mean.

          • fxomt@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Liberalism is against most things that the right wing of the political spectrum explicitly stands for

            I’m assuming you’re talking in a US perspective.

            Leftism describes a spectrum of political ideologies that seeks to minimize hierarchies and desires to achieve equality and egalitarianism. Liberalism is a pro-capitalist ideology, and capitalism is hierarchial and is unequal. Thus, liberalism is right wing. Progressivism isn’t related to right or left wing. You can be a communist but socially conservative. You can be fiscally conservative and be progressive. In the US, being left wing or right wing is mainly measured on how progressive, or if you support social programs (a little leftist, but still can be right wing, just center-right). Liberalism is right wing. Conservatism is far right.

            • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              No. I’m not talking from a US perspective. I’m talking from a political perspective. Liberalism is a moral and political philosophy - that is available in more than one flavour. Many things liberalism stands for are incompatible with right wing governments. Conservatism is far right? No, fascism is far right and there is an enormous difference between being conservative and being a fascist. Right and left are both part of a spectrum and run the whole gamut from dipping your toe in the water to being fully submerged. It’s disingenuous to suggest otherwise.

              • fxomt@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                The whole left and right label is very ambiguous and hard for me to define. I agree liberalism is an umbrella term for a variety of political ideologies. I was mainly talking about classic liberalism, while it seems that you are talking about social liberalism. Social liberalism, at most, is center left. So is social democracy. I was mainly thinking about neoliberalism, and such.

                • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  Again, no. I was talking about John Locke and David Lloyd George type characters - to suggest that the last Liberal party prime minister of the UK was to the right of the political spectrum was an interesting take I’d never heard before.

                  • fxomt@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 hour ago

                    Seems that I am not as educated as you on liberalism. I focus more on socialist ideologies rather than liberalism or other ideologies, So I’ll give this one to you.

                    Have a great weekend :)

        • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          but most of the world considers them to be right wing.

          Yep. I’m fiscally conservative, mildly sympathetic to people who fear and resist change, and fond of the pragmatic pursuit of libertarian ideals, where that’s possible.

          I also feel that how others do sex is none of my damn business, taxes supporting social services are necessary, and equitably applied rule of law is critical for any real economic prosperity.

          On the scale of history, I suspect that makes me centrist or even a moderate conservative.

          In my country, and today, somehow, astonishingly, this combination makes me what most would call very left leaning.

          I feel that the right has gone insane and continues to alienate people who might otherwise have been allies.

          • fxomt@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            16 hours ago

            In my country, and today, somehow, astonishingly, this combination makes me what most would call very left leaning.

            Let me guess, the US? The only people i’ve ever heard call liberals something as BS as far-left communists are conservative americans. The overton window in america is so ridiculous it’s hilarious.