Summary

Meta has criticized Australia’s new law banning under-16s from social media, claiming the government rushed it without considering young people’s perspectives or evidence.

The law, approved after a brief inquiry, imposes fines of up to $50 million for non-compliance and has sparked global interest as a potential model for regulating social media.

Supporters argue it protects teens from harmful content, while critics, including human rights groups and mental health advocates, warn it could marginalize youth and ignore the positive impacts of social media.

Enforcement and technical feasibility remain significant concerns.

  • Frog@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Sorry I edited my comment. I think the difference, not just being able to comment, but is being able to post. Like not everyone is able to post an article in Gizmodo but anyone can post a video on YouTube, or a story on Instagram.

    This is just my own thoughts on it. I don’t actually know what the official definition of social media is.

    • Lumidaub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Ah, I see what you’re saying. That might be a way of looking at it.