• bluGill@fedia.io
    17·
    28 days ago

    It is orange they can do whatever they want to the bikelane. Almost every day I have to avoid someone doing construction… if it was a road they would put up signs and provide detours or flagmen but a bike path is for decoration not bikes in their mind.

  • over_clox@lemmy.worldEnglish
    15·
    28 days ago

    I’d gladly move that bullshit to the slashed out lane in between, and if I happened to get arrested, I’d be proud to speak to the judge about it.

    “Your honor, there was an obstacle in the bike lane”

    • njordomir@lemmy.worldEnglish
      3·
      27 days ago

      You aren’t allowed to stop, stand, or drive on a surface marked like the buffer zone between the bike lane and the cars. You are right. That’s exactly where this sign should have been placed

      I bet whoever placed it, just understands dropping off trailers with their work truck and probably hasn’t even thought through how a bike lane works.

      • over_clox@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        27 days ago

        IDK, entirely possible I guess 🤷

        Either way, if I was riding a bicycle IRL and encountered that, I’d move that shit.

        • WoahWoah@lemmy.worldEnglish
          4·
          27 days ago

          Have you seen the video of the guy that rides his bike into cop cars parked in the bike lane in NYC? Pretty hilarious.

        • PaupersSerenade@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          1·
          26 days ago

          It is, but also isn’t. Dana is actually more bike friendly than other places in CA than I’ve experienced. It’s a coastal town that has quite a few teens riding through. I grew up there and never saw anything like this. Not to say it isn’t possible, but I do also think it unlikely

  • njordomir@lemmy.worldEnglish
    14·
    27 days ago

    If they tell you it’s not safe to put their equipment in the buffer zone, ask why it would be safe to send a human through there on a bike.

  • ace_garp@lemmy.worldEnglish
    10·
    27 days ago

    This sign(placement withstanding) is 100% for the twonk in the white car, who can’t even stay in lane.

  • Coreidan@lemmy.worldEnglish
    81·
    28 days ago

    Ya I guess drivers have to be extra alert for bikers considering these fucks are blocking the bike lane forcing them to go around into traffic. Brilliant.

    • Jrockwar@feddit.ukEnglish
      11·
      28 days ago

      I would say that’s what many urban roads (35 mph / 60 km/h) look like in the US.

        • PaupersSerenade@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          2·
          26 days ago

          There’s no way it’s at the ping you set it to. I’ve been visiting the Harbor for years and that’s not what it looks like. I’d wager it’s Niguel near the Ritz based on fencing, but I didn’t frequent that area as often.

          I can’t even open your ping (edit to add I meant street view not the ping itself), but I know the area to have a much more level topography. Besides extra vegetation and buildings. Was there anything in particular that made you think it was in the Harbor? Or did you just assume?

    • NarrativeBear@lemmy.worldEnglish
      7·
      28 days ago

      Not to mention the sidewalk, why do we have sidewalks along highway speed roads?

      There should be a complete buffer zone along roadways like this. Things such as planters, dividers or trees. Sidewalks should be plesent to walk along, same for bike ways.

      Trouble is in north America all roadways are “strodes” (neither a street or a road) or a highways. We need better classification systems to differentiate between a street, a road, a highspeed road, a highway, and a interstate.

      • numanair@lemmy.mlEnglish
        2·
        27 days ago

        This is one of the laziest excuses for bike infrastructure I’ve ever seen. It looks like it should be temporary, like they haven’t got around to adding dividers yet.

        • NarrativeBear@lemmy.worldEnglish
          2·
          26 days ago

          Whenever a roadway such as this is in gridlock you always see someone being the first to shoot out into the painted section which is unsafe for everyone. Then as soon as that happens you have a full line of people following.

          This is why painted lines should be accompanied by proper roadway design using curbs, medians, and various other traffic calming measures. Unfortunately, the road in this picture like many is over engineered wide from the start.

          Relevant video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hETXvywRDsk

    • over_clox@lemmy.worldEnglish
      4·
      27 days ago

      Probably because if there wasn’t a bike lane, bicyclists would be forced to use the road. I’m pretty sure there aren’t any bicyclists riding at automobile highway speeds. Obviously counterintuitive to block the bike lane with that sign though.

      Some areas in a town near me have bridges that don’t have bike lanes, and it’s technically illegal for bicyclists or pedestrians to cross those bridges. But there’s no other way to get to the other side of town without crossing one or the other bridge.

      Act like that’ll stop me from crossing on a bicycle if and when I need to? Hell no, but I ain’t about to ride in traffic, I ride cautiously in the service lane. That sucks though, the service lanes are lined with reflectors and littered with broken glass and tire fragments and shit.

      The world in general needs more proper bike lanes, without boneheads screwing up and making them unsafe with random obstacles.

      WATCH FOR BIKES? Well no shit, if that sign is in front of me, I see a bicycle right under my ass, that’s what the lane is for right?

      Put the stupid sign in the buffer zone and call it a day…

  • Liz@midwest.socialEnglish
    5·
    26 days ago

    Independent of that sign, riding your bike on that road would be hell I’m sure basically no one uses it.