AI bonuses, unfortunately, do not translate to job security for employees in other divisions.

    • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      15k to ruin someone’s livelihood? I’ll take 2000, please!

      Man what a great system.

      • Cyyris@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        We gotta give them a huge tax break too! That way it’ll trickle down straight into the CEO’s pocket!

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      So the company still gained, but with that money they could have cut 300 less employees and that would have been 300 people making 100k/year instead of one guy making 30.6m more…

  • nightm4re
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    ummm… 👉👈 Tax the rich, maybe?

  • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    Providing nothing that isn’t covered by other areas of the business, while profiting off the misery of others?

    Guillotine.

  • lobut@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    When CEOs say they feel it when they need to do layoffs, I think they mean in their wallets.

    • _____@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      they probably don’t feel anything when making any kind of purchase, it’s more like raw unfiltered greed

  • apotheotic (she/her)@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    $30.6m/2000 is $15.3k per employee laid off, basically a full time minimum wage job. Fucking unreal that you can justify one person getting a raise that could support 2000 people’s entire livelihood. Obviously, these Microsoft employees were not earning minimum wage, but its still outrageous.

  • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t think the board pays CEOs according to how many jobs they save. I don’t know where you got that idea.

    In fact I’m pretty sure that the more people they get rid of, the better paid they are.