You must log in or register to comment.
This is my surprised face
It should be a law everywhere that lawmakers can’t be exempt from laws they pass on everyone else.
What about laws that just concerns them ?
Because saying no to every law reducing their revenues seems to also be frequently blocked…
Who the hell gets to decide their own salary beside some lawmakers?
I am so incredibly surprised by this…
Who am I kidding it was clear from the start they were going to do this. It just further proves that:
- they know this shit erodes any semblance of private digital communications down to the bedrock
- this thing being for “the protection of children” is just a front for them to lie it into effect
At this point I cannot take any politician seriously who would vote “yes” to this surveilance law given the blatant malicious intent behind it.