• nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The hard part of math isn’t understanding esoteric symbols it’s the theory behind it and it’s application. Number theory will mindbreak almost all people.

  • ChrislyBear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I disagree. It’s a while loop, because a for-loop is finite, so you can’t count to infinity with it.

    • Kempeth@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wanna see how you get a while loop to actually go to infinity. I’ll wait…

      on second thought, no I won’t.

  • horni3000@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    You can reduce this readable code into one line of confusing python list comprehension that runs 100x slower!

  • someacnt@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just notational difference other than presence of mutation… How is it harder to understand 3 + 6 + 9 + ... + 3n means compared to the for loop? Is repeated addition hard to grasp?

    • Kempeth@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      No it’s not harder to grasp, just less concise. Summation and Product notation exist for the same reason we don’t say “a discernible but subtle level of humidity” and just use “moist” instead - it’s more convenient. People can be taught to readily understand “moist” or the summation notation. It’s much harder to teach people to read the longer notation more quickly.

  • _number8_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    i hate that we all got so frightened about math. it’s genuinely fun to learn how it works when you’re not being forced to in a school setting, which was just a fucking nightmare for no reason. i had this former navy DI lady teacher in gifted kid algebra [so already a year ahead] yell at me for asking questions; she wasn’t going to ‘hold my hand’ thru the homework, which was quite literally her fucking job

    • Duckef@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Turning 35 in a month and I’ve just started learning maths again after being afraid of it because of a similar situation to yours.

      • Square Singer@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s surprisingly easy. I used tl give maths tutoring to finance my university degree. What I’d do is let the kids do one exercise task from their school books to see where their difficulties were. While they were on it, I quickly read through the relevant sections in the book, and it was so easy every time that I knew everything I needed to know after a few minutes. Like literally stuff that took weeks at school within minutes.

        School just sucks and makes it really hard to learn anything. Almost everything kids learn at school is actually really easy.

        • veroxii@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well it’s harder for them because they are kids and their brains are still developing. You’ve had a lifetime of experiences to draw from where you use math concepts subconsciously many times a day.

          • Square Singer@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Totally true. They haven’t learned to learn yet, they aren’t learning because they want to, or even because they need what they learned.

            But the point I was trying to make is, that many adults are still afraid (and many even strongly so) of maths, because it was hard for them at school. But it probably wouldn’t be hard for them now.

  • Inky@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This post confuses me. Why would code be simpler than the math notation? Both involve symbolic abstraction of basically the same complexity