• NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    There you can see how bad they are treating their customers, declaring end of support against their wishes and demands.

    • Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      What? There’s lots of reasons to complain about Microsft, but their legacy support is not one of them. Almost every product they make gets 10 years of support + 3 more if you pay for it. In comparison, Postgres only does 5, MySQL is 8, and Mongo is 3.

      • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        its generally just consumers on the consumer OS who have that image of Microsoft.

        take for example their Xbox Division. Microsoft is the o nlu company where its possible to throw in an OG xbox game in their modern console and play it (after a compatibility patch). Both nintendo and sony couldnt even fathom that kind of backwards compatibility. Microsoft is also the one who keeps up their digital store (on console) the longest

  • WagnasT@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    I had to deploy a couple MS SQL clusters years ago, I’m fuzzy on the details but for whatever reason we needed a domain admin to enable clustering and instead of following the permissions on the KB they gave up just made the service account a domain admin.

    To this day I’ll never understand why a vendor would choose MS SQL or Oracle if they don’t have a very specific function that they need.

    • expr@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      Yep. Postgres is fantastic and there’s no justification to use proprietary bullshit like that.