• als@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 month ago

    The fact that McDonalds let them work 70 to 100 hours a week (With one victim who worked a 30-hour shift) shows that they are happy to exploit people. This is a crime in its own right, ignoring the fact that their wages were stolen

    • Darkard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I can’t speak for the bread factory. But most McDonald’s are franchise locations and are run by people who don’t work directly for the company using their own hr and payroll. While McD corp are not wholly absolved by that fact, the franchisee and their back office staff (which in my experience are often their own family and friends) will have almost certainly been aware of what was going on but been happy to have the slaves working there anyway.

      • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s the whole point of the franchise system. The franchisees can basically only make money if they horrifically exploit people and the corporation can deny responsibility. This is not some aberration, this is how the system works.

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Yep, the franchise is supposedly an independent business, except they can’t choose suppliers, can’t change the menu, can’t change prices, can’t do their own marketing, etc. The only variable they have any control over is basically personnel, so that’s where they try to save as much money as possible.

      • als@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah sorry I meant that this McDonalds let them do this. I’m not an expert on labour laws in the UK but surely a 30 hour shift should be illegal, if it’s not already

        • BlackArtist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Labour laws are often exploited in the UK around working hours, if you look at the care sector and the hours people regularly put in you’d be horrified.

  • orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s funny because the article claims that the companies failed to spot it. We have no evidence that they failed to spot it. We only have evidence that they failed to take action. So then we left asking the question, if someone did spot it, what would they have done?

    It’s simply unbelievable that nobody spotted it, so then we’re left wondering whether they reported the situation to their supervisors, and why nobody took any action. Bribery seems like a likely possibility. Of course I have no solid evidence. But neither did the author of the article.