• eleitl@lemm.eeOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Obviously at high population densities foraging is itself a problem.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago
    1. There’s not enough for everyone to forage, passing laws allowing everyone to forage would be like a swarm of locusts that the environment might no bounce back from. Wild animals can’t just go to Aldi’s if hipsters “foraged” all the food.

    2. These days you can’t really trust foraged food due to all the pollution

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        The only mention of foraging is berries in Norway, and that doesn’t even include every kind of berry…

        Wild berry foraging is part of the right. Picking cloudberries may, however, be restricted on privately owned land in northern parts of Norway.[

        • eleitl@lemm.eeOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          There are in practice very few restrictions in Scandinavia. It only works because the population density and rate of abuse is low.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            That’s not what your source says…

            And it’s not even what you claimed the source said originally…

            I get you’re the mod and this is your sub, but you’re just saying random shit that’s factually untrue.

  • maketotaldestr0i@lemm.eeM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    In 17th- to 20th-century England, the Lockeian idea that property should be made and held by the highest-value creators formed the justification for enclosure of the commons.

    Thats not a lockeian idea. Locke was quite clear that private property was unjustifiable when there wasn’t as much and as good available for everyone else.