• mctoasterson@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    You’re already legally required to manually register with the selective service if you are male and you turn 18.

    Why not just introduce legislation to end that requirement altogether.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Automatic registration for Selective Services, not automatic draft. That’s very different. This is actually helpful in keeping people out of prison or getting fined for not registering.

      But yes, this absolutely proves that they could automatically register people to vote with no designated party affiliation.

      • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        As a European I have always been confused when Americans talk about “voter registration”. The way it works in my country is you are legally required to register your residence with the government and that registration is automatically used to determine a voter registry (just filtering by age, citizenship and exclusion due to criminal convictions all of which is information already known to the government). I always just get a letter a few weeks before elections informing me where my polling place is.

        • lud@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Btw it’s insane to exclude people in a supposed democracy based on criminal convictions.

            • lud@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              It seems that they exclude people wherever the commenter lives too.

              • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                Can exclude, not all of them do, I think it has to be a specific part of the sentence (ie not automatic) because some high court ruled that some years ago.

                • lud@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Can exclude, not all of them do Who are “them”?

                  Who is excluding people where you live and why can they do that? Isn’t it handled centrally by a single governmental body?

  • Bonesy91@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I know I’m not the smartest fork in the kitchen, but how are they able to just pass this when it should be something we get to vote on?

    • androogee (they/she)@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I mean if you wanna argue that that is the way it should work, I guess we could have that conversation.

      (Way too many people I know won’t keep themselves informed enough to vote on representatives, let alone understanding every individual bill well enough to vote on those.)

      But if you’re under the impression that that is how it currently works, I guess all I can really do is recommend you take a civics class or something cause that’s wild lmao