• istanbullu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    I can watch Youtube without ads using an adblocker or NewPipe. Why anyone buys Premium is beyond me.

    • thanatotus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Could be one of the many reasons such as ensuring their favorite creators get paid for their views and end users not being tech savvy enough to know about ad blockers and NewPipe.

      • Ilandar@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s a poor reason. Google takes a big cut, just pay the YouTuber(s) directly through their favourite donation service; most have at least one these days. This is like when people claim they pay for Spotify because they “care about supporting musicians”. It’s delusional at best and a straight up lie at worst.

  • Illuminostro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Its too fucking expensive for what you get. Throw in access to all movires and TV for $15, then maybe I’ll subscribe.

  • Oisteink@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    It sounds kinda illegal. Can Coca-cola stop me from going to Denmark to buy for danish prices and claim I have to pay Norwegian prices?

    It’s directly comparable to buying danish subscription and using the service from a danish exit. If my data originates in china and are vpn-ed to Denmark they have the same cost on providing me service as anyone else in Denmark

    Edit: I’ve never been to China, but it’s like really far away from Denmark.

    • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      The purpose, is to keep it difficult enough that the “honest” person doesn’t get the idea to start doing it.

      Same concept as putting a lock on your front door. It’s not to stop thieves, it’s to stop the average person from getting the idea to “just take a quick look”.

      By occasional going after workarounds AND making it public news. Your average computer user thinks it’s not worth the hassle.

      • KillingAndKindess@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Which they’ve shown they aren’t willing to do…

        Personally, YT premium is my only subscription I have, and wouldn’t really have any others if money wasn’t this tight. But I was paying before this recent anti blocker war, I prefer YT Music just because of the way it handles a bunch of the music remixed by seperate and probably not “official” artists. And with how much youtube I watch on mobile instead of my PC, messing with blocking wasn’t very appealing to me, since the jump from YTmusic to full premium is less than almost any streaming sub.

        But I have always watched/backgroundnoised a lot of youtube, so its not that much of pain. Realistically, this was bound to happen eventually, hosting that much content hasn’t really gone down in costs as quickly as most tech overhead. But its a fairly complex line item, not just hardware & facilities, but all the law office hours related to copyright log is an ongoing and probably still growing cost for them and since they are not Disney thats a real cost I’d imagine.

        As a side note, it just reminds me how shockingly unaware I am of how much they must value our personal data, that it only just now became worthwile to fight blockers with this much effort and PR/image depreciation.

        • ladfrombrad 🇬🇧@lemdro.idM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          how much they must value our personal data, that it only just now became worthwile to fight blockers with this much effort and PR/image depreciation.

          You got it, on the nose.

          Shadow boxing is always good practice.

      • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah but on one hand the price they want I’m not willing to pay, but if I could get it for less then I’d consider it.

          • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            It’s only worth what people are willing to pay. Already have Spotify anyways and not a fan of googles app killing tactics, learned that the hard way a couple times.

  • geelgroenebroccoli@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Luckily they can’t do this in the EU. As an EU-citizen, I have the right to subscribe in Romania, for example, and pay no more than a Romanian would.