• elevenant@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Does anyone know what there business model could be here? Technically they could get access to all federated content, just as regular instances do. But legally they don’t own that content nor do they know what country it origi ated in. This sounds like a legal nightmare to me. Would they even be allowed to process content in any form created by EU users under GDPR?

  • ericflo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Am I living in a different planet from the rest of the commenters here? We have much more to gain from this than they do.

    • ccunix@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not really no.

      The process of “embrace, extend and extinguish” has been used multiple times to destroy FLOSS projects from the inside.

      Of the top of my head:

      • Kerberos
      • Office formats
      • XMPP

      I’ve just got back from a run so my brain is not fully connected, so others can give other examples.

      Meta do not want to join the party for fun. They want to join because it is the only way they can smother it.

      • Kissaki@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Can you elaborate on them? Stating just the names requires you to already be aware of how they were taken over.