We cannot lower carbon emissions if we keep producing steel with fossil fuels.

    • hahattpro@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      what about giving up on steel and moving into something more ‘vintage’, like clay @_@

      • pumpkinseedoil@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        That’s fundamentally different from steel. We don’t really have an alternative currently. You could use something like aluminium but that’s not environmentally friendly either (in the initial production, for recycling it’s great).

    • cordlesslamp@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Use renewable and clean energy sources to produce electricity then make steel with induction heater or other forms of electricity-based heat?

      • pumpkinseedoil@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Coal is required for steel, electricty-based heat would only work to lower carbon emissions (especially when recycling steel since you don’t need coal there), but you couldn’t prevent them.

        • WallEx@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          “… Only work to lower carbon emissions” But thats exactly the point, that it is high emissions now.