Someone forgot that bike lanes should actually have space for a bike. And maybe not cobblestones.
Legally, combined footpath/bike lanes over here should have a minimum width of 2.3m. Between line and tree there is less than 0.8m.
You must log in or register to comment.
Fucking millennials, first there’s too few trees, now there’s too many, can’t make up their minds, can they. /s
Leave the tree, remove the road.
I think I’ve gotten at the root of the problem
I’m stumped.
Most bike lane planners just assume that we can teleport through trees
If I could teleport, I wouldn’t bike ;)
Yeah, bike paths always have least priority. Their main point is to show up in the “Our city has X kilometers of bike path” statistic.
And maybe not cobblestones.
We have a bunch of paths where bikes and pedestrians have their own lanes side by side (both way to narrow, but that’s not the point). The pedestrian half is flat tarmac, the bike half is tiles like above. Really annoying.
This is evil. That happens when the planner of a bike path has never used a bike in their life.
