• anteaters@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s what you get when you vote right wing into your government. Fascists feel accepted and they are only against molestation when done by the evil foreigners. When it’s done by their own they see women as cattle for men to ogle and touch. Never believe their lies about being for “equality” or women’s rights.

    • MetaPhrastes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The decision has been taken by a college of judges of the court (which is even worse than a single person).

  • Novman@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fake news. The person was aquitted cause it was not the intention of the act. It was accidental. Simply as that. But western media love to spread hate against italy and italians.

    • notepass@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      How do you ACCIDENTALLY put your hands INTO someones pants for 10 fucking seconds?

      This is not something that just happens. The fuck?

      • Novman@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The situation was obviously more complicated than that, the sentence was long and i have no time to explain it cause i’m not a journalist. Spreading hate falsifing and omitting is the usual anglosaxon method to attack their enemies.

        • notepass@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          She described walking up a staircase to class with a friend, when she felt her trousers fall down, a hand touching her buttocks and grabbing her underwear.

          “Love, you know I was joking,” the man told her when she turned around.

          Would he say

          “Love, you know I was joking,” the man told her when she turned around.

          If it was an accident?

          Additionally, what does

          The situation was obviously more complicated than that, the sentence was long and i have no time to explain it cause i’m not a journalist.

          refer to? Which sentence? You can just copy it over here, people can read.

          • Novman@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            And you trust media? I’m not translating the whole trial. It is a lost cause to stop american pitchforks. Racists as usual.

            • notepass@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              What? You went from a complex sentence to a complete trail log and went to “Media cannot be trusted”.

              BTW: You can also paste Italian stuff. Automated translators exist. They are not perfect but good enough.

              • GojuRyu@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                I think the sentence they are referring to is the sentencing in the trial, not a sentence as in a string of words.

              • Novman@feddit.it
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                I thought one think. Why argue with americans that are scandalized about an involontary grouping when is normal in us school to have mass shooting? Maybe he had to shoot the student, less problems.

                • notepass@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  This conversation is getting funnier by the moment. You still on “involuntary groping” without even acknowledging what I put up against this before.

                  And now you add the completely unrelated whataboutism regarding shootings in the US to this?

                  For how much you seem to hate on the Americans, you would make a great candidate for the republican party over there. Reactionary babbeling of bullshit and ignorance of every argument brought up against you works pretty well there.

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well, I can almost see the point that there needs to be a criteria to draw a line where there’s no way to call it accidental or incidental contact on a legal level.

    However, I just groped my wife’s bobs for five seconds and she asked if it was foreplay or just because I was bored.

    So, I think we can safely say that it sure as fuck isn’t ten seconds before it can be definitively called groping for the purposes of assault if five seconds between a couple is going to be noticeable as more than a friendly way of saying hello.

    In other words, the judge is fucking crazy lol.

    • agrammatic@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not to mention that

      a) going under the plaintiff’s outer clothing very clearly moves the onus of demonstrating that it was accidental back on the accused’s side, because no reasonable third-party can accept that you can accidentally slip and fall into someone’s pants

      and

      b) the accused admitted that the action was intentionally non-consensual, but their defence was that the motive was non-malicious

      Even before we look at the duration, there are other factors that make the case way more clear-cut than this judge thinks it is.