ICC Prosecutor Tapped External Panel to Review Evidence: Is That Even Allowed?

www.lawfaremedia.org

ICC Prosecutor Tapped External Panel to Review Evidence: Is That Even Allowed?

www.lawfaremedia.org

fukhueson@lemmy.world to

World Politics@lemmy.world · 4 months ago

Neither the Rome Statute nor fundamental fairness evidently permitted the ICC prosecutor to instruct an external panel of legal experts he assembled to review evidence he used to support his applications for arrest warrants of Israeli leaders.

You must log in or register to comment.

Chat

World Politics@lemmy.world

globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Create a post

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

A place for major political news from around the world, excluding North American Politics.

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Title must match the article headline
- No United States or Canadian politics
- Recent (Past 14 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
- Article must be related to Politicians, Nation-states, Electoralism, or International Relations
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Articles based on misinformation or outright propaganda will be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (perjorative, perjorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (perjorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

Lemmy World Partners

!news@lemmy.world

!politics@lemmy.world

!world@lemmy.world

Recommendations

How to spot Misinformation and Propaganda

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

1 user / day
1 user / week
2 users / month
22 users / 6 months
2 local subscribers
715 subscribers
82 Posts
21 Comments
Modlog

mods:
🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.world