cross-posted from: https://lemmy.one/post/197223
With everything going on with Twitter and Reddit I feel like I have a new appreciation for having my own local knowledge base on Logseq.
Some of my colleagues swear by logseq, but I personally haven’t used it. If the upcoming sync feature would be available to self-host, I might consider switching to it, as it would combine multiple services that we are currently using.
It seems to be file based, so wouldn’t it be able to use other self-hosted sync-tools like the next cloud client (given you’re hosting your own instance)?
Does this also work in a collaborative way, for example two people editing the same note? I would guess that file locking could be an issue.
Depends ok the cloud solution you use, but it definitely could be an issue. Probably not because of locking, but because the files probably aren’t locked with the clientson there could be issues while merging the changes.
In obsidian I use the self hosted live sync so I can keep my vaults synchronized between my iOS, Linux and Windows devices. Is this possible in logseq yet? I would love to switch, obsidian is great but I try to use as much open source software as possible.