• Sleeping@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Didn’t they literally say they wouldn’t force re-open sub reddit’s? Suprise suprise another lie.

    • LaserXP@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      tbh Im not surprised they would. r/piracy is both niche and wouldnt be worth to remove mods for. Subs like r/aww or r/funny however are main parts of Reddit, and this also applies to massive game subs like r/Minecraft

  • Square Singer@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Replacing mods is a fun idea. But where do you get replacement mods from? Already before the whole debacle most subreddits had more or less intrusive “We are looking for new mods” statements all around their sub. One sub I’m in has a bot that comments on every post that they are urgently looking for mods.

    And that was before Reddit started a war with the mods.

    Are they going to let ChatGPT work as a mod?

        • Lorez@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          hypocrite

          Literally founded the place; chosen by co-founders/people with stakes in the company to be their CEO. That’s how businesses work, OP, stop being silly.

          • Square Singer@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            No problem with that. The hypocritical part is that he argued that mods are bad, because they aren’t chosen democratically. Here’s the quote I have trouble with:

            “If you’re a politician or a business owner, you are accountable to your constituents." “And I think, on Reddit, the analogy is closer to the landed gentry: The people who get there first get to stay there and pass it down to their descendants, and that is not democratic.”

            He says, the mods are bad because they haven’t been elected. But neither has he.

            If he wants to suppress mods because they weren’t voted in, maybe there should be a vote about his position.

            • Lorez@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              undefined> mods are bad, because they aren’t chosen democratically

              Why do you think a guy who started/runs the company should be held to the same standards as its users? I open a cake shop, I get to make the rules, even though I’m not ‘democratically elected’ by my customers. The very idea that someone has to vote me in is hilarious to me. If, in my shop, I let you run a lemonade stand, you won’t have the same rights as I. How is this not obvious?

              • Square Singer@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                So because he’s the CEO he shouldn’t be held to standards? Bold take.

                But sure, he doesn’t have to follow any standards. He can run Reddit in the ground as much as he likes. But he can’t expect the mods and the users to stay if he holds others to ridiculous standards while not caring a bit about his own standards.