• Heringssalat@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    In reality, however, inequalities have persistently grown, to the point where today the richest 1% of the world’s population own almost half of the global wealth and that same 1% also emit more CO2 than the poorest half of the planet.

    Dumb argument for a tax in the EU.
    If you earn 45000€ or more per year (post-tax) you are in the 1%. (According to this)
    That sure is a nice wage, but it’s definitely not rich and employees with a degree are not the people we should be taxing even more.

    Also this:

    The richest 1% of the planet own nearly half of all wealth. These same ultra-rich emit more CO2 than the poorest half of the planet.

    So 45000€ is ultra-rich?

    • Torres@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I couldn’t find anywhere what they mean by 1%. If it’s as you say, and an annual income of €4500 is enough to be considered as such, then I think it would be quite excessive.

      • Heringssalat@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        the richest 1% of the world’s population

        If you earn 45000€ a year, which in many countries is just a bit above average, then you are richer than 99% of people in the entire world.

    • 9bananas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      the 1% the petition is talking about is global, as well as the ownership claims, and the CO2 pollution claim.

      it’s worded a bit oddly, but they want to tax the “global 1%”, not (just) the “EU 1%”.

      as you pointed out, there’s a pretty big difference between the two.

      since the initiatives goals are largely about climate change, which is obviously a global problem in need of global solutions, this framing makes sense. it could have been written a bit clearer…

      • Version@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No. If you own 40.000€ per year, you are in the top 1% globally. So, „taxing the rich 1%“ means not only taxing billionaires, but also average incomes in western countries.

        Edit: Here you can check how rich you actually are: How rich am I?

        • BuldgingVampire@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nice Website but its only checks your income. If you have to work for your money your not rich in a western country

          • Version@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            What? Of course you are. You are not rich by western standards, but globally you are.

  • Sigmatics@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ll be the one to pop the bubble. All this will do: people will move their assets outside the EU, making tax havens even richer.

    • sirjash@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      This in turn will put more pressure on legislators to go after them. This game only works until it doesn’t