• gnate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t accept the premise – the pattern is read on transport, yes? Rather than a fixed record of one’s composition. Therefore, the only aging you won’t be doing is for the duration of the transport process itself. Chump change.

    • ClockworkN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      They regularly allude to the idea of “pattern buffers” that hold on to a copy of you for as long as the plot requires.

      • gnate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Sure, but I don’t think those are used as a matter of standard practice. The idea of some immutable, archival pattern being used for each trip doesn’t track.

        • MaggiWuerze@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I thought you were read into the buffer until your pattern was wholly scanned and then replicated onto the target from it