Rep. Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts and Sen. Peter Welch of Vermont submitted the legislation, named the Inclusive Democracy Act, on Tuesday which would guarantee the right to vote in federal elections for all citizens regardless of their criminal record.

In a statement, Pressley said the legislation was necessary due to policies and court rulings that “continue to disenfranchise voters from all walks of life — including by gutting the Voting Rights Act, gerrymandering, cuts to early voting, and more.” Welch called the bill necessary due to “antiquated state felony disenfranchisement laws.”

In late 2022, approximately 4.6 million people were unable to vote due to a felony conviction, according to a study by the Sentencing Project, a nonpartisan research group. The same study found that Black and Hispanic citizens are disproportionately likely to be disenfranchised due to felony

  • logicbomb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’d prefer compulsory voting from all able people of voting age. Prisons should have full in-person voting locations with private voting booths. Mail-in ballots should be a freely available option for all.

    It doesn’t guarantee good results, but I feel it is the most straightforward way to rid ourselves of voter suppression campaigns, which I think are fundamentally evil.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s not much of a tax when it can be “paid” by sending a piece of paper through the mail, postage-paid.

        Australia does this. It works out very well.

        • bob_lemon@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Hey, you’re talking to the country that has you actively apply to get a right to vote. The US is seemingly incapable of keeping track of their own citizens.

            • bob_lemon@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              Yeah, I just wrote another comment and noticed that the government probably has addresses because the IRS needs those to function.