• relevants@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    …how did the line come about? How did they determine what the life expectancy would have been with less expenditure per capita?

    • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      There is a minimum amount which is likely the least some people spent on their health. So there is no interpolation I can see.

      • relevants@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        That doesn’t make sense unless this was personal expenditure, which it doesn’t seem to be

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Definitely, you can see some lines in the top left zigzagging back left, which would not be possible if each was a function of the x-axis. In fact, both axes are a function of the hidden z-axis, which is time and comes in discrete yearly steps, the latest of which (2021) is highlighted.

    • cmac@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      At least one of those lines goes back on itself at some point, so my assumption is that it’s tracking where each country has been over time.

      • relevants@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Ooh good catch. That makes sense. Not sure I would call this beautiful, especially without any way to tell how much time has passed, but fair enough