• MajorHavoc@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    It’s not really any faster to do things unsafe

    Yeah. Which is how I roll with Python now, as a Python Zen master. But Python was a little charmer when I was learning it to replace my Perl scripts.

    In contrast, Rust would not shut up the last time I was trying to do an unsafe local bubble sort, just to get to know it. What I got to know was that I was working with a language that was going to go out of it’s way to get in my, each time way I wanted to do something it didn’t like.

    Rust was easily the worst first date with a programming language I have had in a long time, and I can code in both varieties of ‘Pikachu’.

    Again, it’s just my first impression, not the last word on the language. But I have enough tools in my belt that I didn’t need to add Rust.

    I’ll try that ‘unsafe’ flag next time, and we will see if it can sort my local music files by artist name without having a security fit.

    Edit: Responses here have convinced me not to give Rust another shot. Reeks of the Java community. If that’s what’s happening here, the Java devs can have this one to themselves. They’ll probably fill it with XML again. I didn’t want to like Rust anyway. And everyone needs to get off my lawn.

    • Fal@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      You’re missing the point. Tools are different. Trying to learn and use rust by writing unsafe bubble sort is pointless. Use it to actually accomplish something and you’ll find out just how amazing it is.

      Using the ecosystem that exists to be productive and not have to think at all about whether what you’re doing is correct is the point. It catches the subtle errors for you and lets you use the powerful libraries like clap for command line parsing, tokio, etc.