• In short: Transgender woman Roxanne Tickle is suing social media platform Giggle for Girls after she was excluded from the women-only app.
  • She is alleging unlawful discrimination on the basis of gender identity while the app’s founder has denied she is a woman.
  • What’s next? The hearing is expected to run for four days.

A transgender woman who was excluded from a women-only social media app should be awarded damages because the app’s founder has persistently denied she is a woman, a Sydney court has heard.

In February 2021, Roxanne Tickle downloaded the Giggle for Girls social networking app, which was marketed as a platform exclusively for women to share experiences and speak freely.

Users needed to provide a selfie, which was assessed by artificial intelligence software to determine if they were a woman or man.

Ms Tickle’s photograph was determined to be a woman and she used the app’s full features until September that year, when the account became restricted because the AI decision was manually overridden.

  • prof@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    While I certainly agree with you that discrimination based on sex is unacceptable im most contexts, I believe that gender exclusive spaces, unless they hinder people directly, sometimes are a good thing.

    My dad is a mental health professional and founded a weekly ‘only-men’ self help group. He found that some things they talked about there wouldn’t have worked with women involved. That group existed for about 5 years or so and helped quite a few struggling men.

    So yeah, unless there’s any maliciousness involved, I’d argue that gender exclusiity is not bad in every context.

    • endhits@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      If women have gender exclusive spaces, men also should have them. Women have invaded male spaces for decades.

      • iegod@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        ‘Invaded’ lol what. Dude the boys club is a real thing. And it’s everywhere.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s a bit different. A little private group is not a for-profit company. The difference between not being invited to a family only event when you aren’t family and not being allowed into a restaurant chain because of your race.

      • prof@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        The group I referenced had a paid membership. Scale that up and make it digital and you may end up with a gender exclusive social media app.

        I get what you mean though, but I feel there’s a bit more nuance than what you imply.