• rottingleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    45
    ·
    10 days ago

    Except maybe for children and the dumber types, most people already know what evil looks like. They are willing to pretend, so what more lifelike portrayals will do is irritate them.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Except maybe for… the dumber types,

      A non-negligible portion of the electorate, unfortunately.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 days ago

        The latter portion, which wants portrayed evil to be grotesque and not like reality, because they are not going to avoid evil anyway, is even bigger.

        I mean, I don’t like fools. Like half of my family are terrible fools. But the “smart” people with no idea of kindness, fair conduct or at least sport are worse, and in my experience more common than fools, not less.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        No, it’s the “neutral” types. Who are all good when the guys with skulls are defeated, and all compliant when the guys with skulls are in charge.

        Guys with skulls themselves are usually more peculiar types, not really discomforted by open public discourse. Just not limiting themselves to any moral boundary. You’d probably find them interesting.