Day 8: Resonant Collinearity

Megathread guidelines

  • Keep top level comments as only solutions, if you want to say something other than a solution put it in a new post. (replies to comments can be whatever)
  • You can send code in code blocks by using three backticks, the code, and then three backticks or use something such as https://topaz.github.io/paste/ if you prefer sending it through a URL

FAQ

  • Gobbel2000@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    Rust

    Proper Point and Vector types made this pretty simple, part 2 was just a tiny change (basically while instead of if), but left with a lot of copy-pasted code.

    Solution
    use euclid::default::*;
    
    const N_ANTENNAS: usize = (b'z' - b'0') as usize + 1;
    // For each frequency (from b'0' to b'z') the list of antenna positions
    type Antennas = Box<[Vec<Point2D<i32>>]>;
    
    fn parse(input: String) -> (Antennas, Rect<i32>) {
        let mut antennas = vec![Vec::new(); N_ANTENNAS].into_boxed_slice();
        let mut width = 0;
        let mut height = 0;
        for (y, l) in input.lines().enumerate() {
            height = y + 1;
            if width == 0 {
                width = l.len()
            } else {
                assert!(width == l.len())
            }
            for (x, b) in l.bytes().enumerate().filter(|(_, b)| *b != b'.') {
                antennas[(b - b'0') as usize].push(Point2D::new(x, y).to_i32())
            }
        }
        let bounds = Rect::new(Point2D::origin(), Size2D::new(width, height).to_i32());
        (antennas, bounds)
    }
    
    fn part1(input: String) {
        let (antennas, bounds) = parse(input);
        let mut antinodes = vec![vec![false; bounds.width() as usize]; bounds.height() as usize];
        for list in antennas.iter().filter(|l| !l.is_empty()) {
            for (i, &a) in list.iter().enumerate().skip(1) {
                for &b in list.iter().take(i) {
                    let diff = b - a;
                    let ax = a - diff;
                    if bounds.contains(ax) {
                        antinodes[ax.y as usize][ax.x as usize] = true;
                    }
                    let bx = b + diff;
                    if bounds.contains(bx) {
                        antinodes[bx.y as usize][bx.x as usize] = true;
                    }
                }
            }
        }
        let sum = antinodes
            .iter()
            .map(|row| row.iter().map(|b| u32::from(*b)).sum::<u32>())
            .sum::<u32>();
        println!("{sum}");
    }
    
    fn part2(input: String) {
        let (antennas, bounds) = parse(input);
        let mut antinodes = vec![vec![false; bounds.width() as usize]; bounds.height() as usize];
        for list in antennas.iter().filter(|l| !l.is_empty()) {
            for (i, &a) in list.iter().enumerate().skip(1) {
                for &b in list.iter().take(i) {
                    let diff = b - a;
                    // Start at antenna a, keep going until hitting bounds
                    let mut ax = a;
                    while bounds.contains(ax) {
                        antinodes[ax.y as usize][ax.x as usize] = true;
                        ax -= diff;
                    }
                    let mut bx = b;
                    while bounds.contains(bx) {
                        antinodes[bx.y as usize][bx.x as usize] = true;
                        bx += diff;
                    }
                }
            }
        }
        let sum = antinodes
            .iter()
            .map(|row| row.iter().map(|b| u32::from(*b)).sum::<u32>())
            .sum::<u32>();
        println!("{sum}");
    }
    
    util::aoc_main!();
    

    also on github

      • Gobbel2000@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        I try to use Vecs instead of HashSets and maps whenever the key domain is reasonably small (just the grid in this case), simply because in the end direct memory access is a lot faster than always hashing values.

        But looking at this case again, it is certainly a lot easier to have just antinodes.len() at the end instead of counting all true values. This datastructure is also not really performance-critical, so a HashSet is probably the cleaner choice here.