Summary

Donald Trump announced plans to reform U.S. elections, including mandating paper ballots, same-day voting, voter ID, and proof of citizenship, while eliminating mail-in voting.

Trump criticized California’s ban on requiring voter ID, calling for a nationwide overhaul. Though mail-in and early voting surged during the pandemic, Trump has long opposed these methods, claiming fraud, despite evidence showing fraud rates are extremely low.

Critics argue his proposals could disproportionately affect rural, disabled, and nonwhite voters, potentially disenfranchising key Democratic-leaning groups.

The reforms would mark significant shifts in U.S. election policies.

  • RandAlThor@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    19 days ago

    So tell me why Dems are playing the same game like one hand tied behind their back? Why don’t they do the same shit when they’re in power?

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      19 days ago

      Well the election laws primarily come from the election clause of the constitution. So that couldn’t be changed without an amendment requiring a super majority, which neither party will get. What I assume he is trying to do though, is while having state leaders being majority Republican, have the states update their election laws, because that’s who controls the elections. (Unless the supreme Court blocks it, as we saw with Colorado). Also held by the Republicans.

      I assume his attempts are to lock all the states currently red, red. Is it possible, doubtful. As states also may require super majoritys to update their election processes, but that may vary drastically by state. Shit one state was discussing getting rid of popular vote all together and just allowing their representatives to vote leading up to the election.

      The country we knew as the U.S. is broken. Only threads to hold it together now

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      19 days ago

      Conservatives didn’t start it now, it’s a long game they’re playing for decades, it just became obvious now when it’s in final stage.
      Their goal always was to break checks and balances for them but only for them, and they are able to because they broke enough already. Id Dems will try to do a fraction of what Cons are doing, they will be politically and judicially murdered, partially because of that, and partially because breaking shit is easy and fixing it requires abiding by the letter of law, and that’s hard when the law was deliberately destroyed

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      19 days ago

      Because they don’t want to. The corporate Democrats work for their sponsors, not the people. The few genuine progressives are kept around mainly for show.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      It’s partly because Democrats often tend towards being honest and good people that actually care about good governance.

      The qons don’t and they can just hold things hostage - they basically grab all kinds of things (like balancing budgets) and hold a gun to its head, knowing their dumbass supporters are too stupid to realize that government does do good things - too many of the idiots in the base buy into a whole lot of Libertarian-style anarchy when it comes to “limited government”.

    • KidNamedLainah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      19 days ago

      Because Democrats love losing. They use that as an excuse to blast their constituents with texts on how to donate. They did that when Roe was overturned and a few days after Kamala lost. As another commenter pointed out, they’re beholden to their sponsors and their sponsors want a return on investment.