The Alternative for Germany (AfD) has gained ground in three recent state elections, caused an uproar in the Thuringian parliament and triggering another debate on whether to ban the party outright.

  • Siegfried@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    Too little, too late. You can’t ban a 30% party and expect democracy to hold.

      • Siegfried@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Very noble, but we are at an inconsistency here. Democracy is also incompatible with not allowing people to vote. We have to get a better solution or this will explode in our faces.

    • somenonewho
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The last time they tried to ban a party in Germany was the NPD (another Nazi party) and at the end the Supreme Court decided the reason not to ban them, even though they were clearly unconstitutional , was because they were to few/insignificant (in the end they banned them from receiving party funding which still has a massive effect).

      So you couldnt ban them because they were to small and you can’t ban the AfD because they’re to big? Just because enough people vote for a party doesn’t mean they’re not unconstitutional.