What does Project 2025 say about the National Weather Service, NOAA and National Hurricane Center? - Poynter
www.poynter.org
The policy blueprint for a Republican administration says the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration ‘should be broken up and downsized’
  • grue@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
    72·
    2 months ago

    Did you read the article I linked?

    Here’s the part that should’ve answered your question:

    Initially, the privilege of incorporation was granted selectively to enable activities that benefited the public, such as construction of roads or canals. Enabling shareholders to profit was seen as a means to that end. The states also imposed conditions (some of which remain on the books, though unused) like these:

    • Corporate charters (licenses to exist) were granted for a limited time and could be revoked promptly for violating laws.
    • Corporations could engage only in activities necessary to fulfill their chartered purpose.
    • Corporations could not own stock in other corporations nor own any property that was not essential to fulfilling their chartered purpose.
    • Corporations were often terminated if they exceeded their authority or caused public harm.
    • Owners and managers were responsible for criminal acts committed on the job.
    • Corporations could not make any political or charitable contributions nor spend money to influence law-making.
    • frosty99c@midwest.socialEnglish
      2·
      2 months ago

      “Enabling shareholders to profit was seen as a means to that end.”

      Right, that’s the part I take issue with. Why is there a profit on a public good?

      I agree with all of the restrictions in place, but those have gotten weaker over time, when they should’ve gotten more restrictive. The problem with allowing them to profit is that over time, the profit gives them more bargaining power which allows them to erode the oversight and avoid all consequences for breaking the regulations.