Our Outlook reflects oil production naturally declining at
a rate of about 15% per year. That’s nearly double the IEA’s
prior estimates of about 8%.
This increase is the result of the world’s shifting energy mix
toward “unconventional” sources of oil and natural gas.
These are mostly shale and dense rock formations where
oil and gas production typically declines faster.
To put it in concrete terms: With no new investment, global
oil supplies would fall by more than 15 million barrels per day
in the first year alone.
At that rate, by 2030, oil supplies would fall from 100 million
barrels per day to less than 30 million – that’s 70 million
barrels short of what’s needed to meet demand every day.
The world would experience severe energy shortages and
disruption to daily lives within a year of investment ceasing.
Given price responses to past oil supply shocks, the
permanent loss of 15% of oil supply per year could raise
oil prices by more than 400%. By comparison, prices rose
200% during the oil price shocks of the 1970s.
Within 10 years, unemployment rates would likely reach
30%. That’s higher than during the Great Depression of
the 1930s.
Wow, and this comes from the horse’s own mouth of corporate publication. We are headed for hard times, and soon, as the Permian depletes. It’s surreal that normies are completely unaware of this when it’s like a freight train of doom bearing down on us.
Isn’t this only if no new investment happens AKA no new oil drilling projects? “Within a year of investment ceasing.” Investment isn’t going to cease though, unless I’m misunderstanding. Although, sometime we will run out of oil and then these dire societal effects will happen. Previously, I remember you saying that the average person will start to feel very affected by the energy crunch starting sometime in the 2030’s and that the level of collapse will continue to increase for maybe a few decades after that.
yeah investment will continue and they will extend this timeline but we find less and less which is more costly to extract. The real shock of this is just that the situation is very dire very quickly if the pace cannot keep up. If you consider that investment could cease substantially due to financial issues or the fact that high oil prices may not be sustainable. How fast this collapse can happens if something goes wrong is really the reason i posted this. the decline can be so fierce it would be a huge stagflationary trigger which is how most people will experience this.
Previously, I remember you saying that the average person will start to feel very affected by the energy crunch starting sometime in the 2030’s and that the level of collapse will continue to increase for maybe a few decades after that.
I was probably talking about total energy including natural gas, because natural gas peak estimates come in around 2034, after that its crucial we have built out alternatives sufficiently to at least put a floor beneath us in terms of electrical generation. Its still possible we can get enough build out to at least keep functioning as depletion kicks in but we are currently not aggressive enough with installing renewable or nuclear capacity.
Our Outlook reflects oil production naturally declining at a rate of about 15% per year. That’s nearly double the IEA’s prior estimates of about 8%. This increase is the result of the world’s shifting energy mix toward “unconventional” sources of oil and natural gas. These are mostly shale and dense rock formations where oil and gas production typically declines faster. To put it in concrete terms: With no new investment, global oil supplies would fall by more than 15 million barrels per day in the first year alone. At that rate, by 2030, oil supplies would fall from 100 million barrels per day to less than 30 million – that’s 70 million barrels short of what’s needed to meet demand every day.
The world would experience severe energy shortages and disruption to daily lives within a year of investment ceasing. Given price responses to past oil supply shocks, the permanent loss of 15% of oil supply per year could raise oil prices by more than 400%. By comparison, prices rose 200% during the oil price shocks of the 1970s. Within 10 years, unemployment rates would likely reach 30%. That’s higher than during the Great Depression of the 1930s.
Wow, and this comes from the horse’s own mouth of corporate publication. We are headed for hard times, and soon, as the Permian depletes. It’s surreal that normies are completely unaware of this when it’s like a freight train of doom bearing down on us.
Let’s see those figures compared to effects currently caused by climate change, and as that continues, the collapse of our ecosystem.
Oil companies only care about their profit.
It seems excess deaths from oil extraction decline might eclipse those from climate change, at least initially.
Isn’t this only if no new investment happens AKA no new oil drilling projects? “Within a year of investment ceasing.” Investment isn’t going to cease though, unless I’m misunderstanding. Although, sometime we will run out of oil and then these dire societal effects will happen. Previously, I remember you saying that the average person will start to feel very affected by the energy crunch starting sometime in the 2030’s and that the level of collapse will continue to increase for maybe a few decades after that.
yeah investment will continue and they will extend this timeline but we find less and less which is more costly to extract. The real shock of this is just that the situation is very dire very quickly if the pace cannot keep up. If you consider that investment could cease substantially due to financial issues or the fact that high oil prices may not be sustainable. How fast this collapse can happens if something goes wrong is really the reason i posted this. the decline can be so fierce it would be a huge stagflationary trigger which is how most people will experience this.
I was probably talking about total energy including natural gas, because natural gas peak estimates come in around 2034, after that its crucial we have built out alternatives sufficiently to at least put a floor beneath us in terms of electrical generation. Its still possible we can get enough build out to at least keep functioning as depletion kicks in but we are currently not aggressive enough with installing renewable or nuclear capacity.