jeffw@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · vor 9 MonatenDoes “and” really mean “and”? Not always, the Supreme Court rules.www.motherjones.comexternal-linkmessage-square2fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkDoes “and” really mean “and”? Not always, the Supreme Court rules.www.motherjones.comjeffw@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · vor 9 Monatenmessage-square2fedilink
minus-squareCarlcarla@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·vor 9 MonatenWouldn’t (3) E = (!A) and B and C also be a valid Interpretation?
Wouldn’t
(3) E = (!A) and B and C
also be a valid Interpretation?