• MadhuGururajan@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yes but you’re not so clever to deduce that. Everybody who doesn’t swallow every word politicians use can figure that part out. What would be interesting is if you decide that a politician lying is the reason you’re gonna vote for the other guy. Then I would question the “I don’t even hate her” part.

    • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      “What would be interesting” is if i got to be a fly on the wall the moment you learned the limits of your intellect. Proud of it, yes? You like to show it off? Is that what your comment to me is?

      (I know you’re smart enough to understand that question was rhetorical)

      Where your logic breaks down here: it’s predicated on the premise that i have a motive beyond the words i spoke and the message i sent.

      But i was speaking in frustration, much like you. There’s no motive, sherlock.

      Now please. Take that genius and apply it somewhere useful.